|
Anomalous
objects tracing back to our ancient past are not exclusive to Mars. Strange, unexplained discoveries have been
made in recent years throughout our Solar System. Mars by far shows the best
potential for having supported an ancient civilization in the distant past.
Based on the demonstrated evidence there is a strong probability that advanced
life on Mars was a precursor to life here on Earth. However, growing evidence
from elsewhere - on neighboring planets such as Mercury, Venus and Saturn, and even our
own Moon - points to other intelligent life as also having existed in the
distant past. It is quite
possible that we on Earth are the final civilization to be living in our Solar
System.
In March 1996 it
was announced for the first time that artificial structures had been discovered
on the Moon. The briefing was given by former NASA scientists, engineers and
other researchers, under the title "The Mars Mission", a grassroots space
research and policy group of specialists and citizens. They stated that they
were acting independently of NASA, and that their briefing had not been
sanctioned by the space agency.
At the briefing
in the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. it was stated that, in addition
to NASA, the Soviet Union had photographic evidence proving the presence of
ancient ruins on the Moon. Video films and photos made by U.S. astronauts during
the Apollo program were shown at the briefing. Representatives of the media were
extremely surprised as to why the materials had not been revealed to the public
earlier. It was indicated that this was due to censorship by NASA and the U.S.
government.
These official
mission films, analyzed using scientific techniques and computer technologies
unavailable to NASA 30 years ago (when the original photographs were taken), now
provide compelling evidence for the presence of ancient artificial structures on
the Moon.
The former
manager of the Data and Photo Control Department at NASA's Lunar Receiving
Laboratory during the manned Apollo Lunar Program, Ken Johnston, has released a
number of sensational statements. The specialist said that U.S. astronauts found
ancient ruins of artificial origin when they landed on the Moon. He said that
the U.S. government had been keeping this information a secret for 40 years.
Astronaut Buzz
Aldrin (Apollo 11) in a July 21, 1969 transmission described that several alien
spacecraft were located around a nearby crater on the lunar surface. Neil
Armstrong, the first man to set foot on the moon (Apollo 11), described an
encounter with an alien Moon city or space station and the presence of many
spaceships that were far superior in size and technology to ours in his 1969
lunar expedition. According to Armstrong the extraterrestrials have an
established base on
the Moon and wanted us to leave and stay off the Moon. Have you ever wondered
why the Moon landings stopped and why we haven't tried building a Moon base?
After all it seems a better and easier idea than constructing a floating
(orbiting) Earth space station.
Well it appears
that the final straw for NASA and the U.S. government was the Apollo 17 mission.
In December of 1972 Apollo 17 astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt
spent about 75 hours on the lunar surface in the Taurus-Littrow Valley. During
their moonwalk they discovered, among many other anomalous artifacts, the
severed head of a robot (see photos below). As Cernan put it, even though he was
seeing it with his own eyes, he still couldn't quite bring himself to believe
it. He dubbed the entire valley "one mysterious looking place". Interestingly enough Cernan and Schmitt were the last astronauts to set
foot on the Moon. There were no further Moon landings after Apollo 17.
After this discovery isn't it understandable why?
The list of
expert testimonials is endless. I describe them in detail in my books. These
are not just some geeks reading science fiction books with an over zealous
imagination. They are veteran military
and Air Force personnel along with astronauts, cosmonauts, scientists, intelligence
officials from the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), NSA (National Security
Agency), DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), and experienced NASA/ESA employees associated with interplanetary missions.
And even NASA photo technicians who describe how it is a dedicated job to
airbrush anomalous structures and UFOs from Mars and Moon photos before
releasing them to the public. More and more highly reputable sources are now
coming forward to help expose the truth.
There is hard
visual evidence that there are artificial constructions and areas on the Moon's
surface that are being intentionally obscured from view due to image tampering
by NASA and the U.S. Navy. Some of these structures have slipped through the
censors net and are clearly visible on photographs taken by the Apollo missions
and the Clementine satellite. It is only a matter of time now before the public
at large finds out that the remnants of an ancient civilization, considerably
more advanced than our own, have been discovered on the Moon.
The connection
between lost ancient civilizations elsewhere in our Solar System and technology on Earth is this: if
many of these structures are artificial by design then the intelligence that built them and which lived
on or visited them could very well have been affiliated with Earth's
development in antiquity. Simply witness the uncanny resemblance of Martian
structures and monuments to those here on Earth.
The distance
between planets within our Solar System is very small compared to distances on the
galactic scale. Once it is finally revealed that intelligent life did at one time exist
elsewhere in our Solar System,
humanoid or otherwise, then we must ask what happened to make these civilizations
disappear almost without a trace? What catastrophic event devastated the entire
Martian landscape? Why the need to cover-up, lie and purposely mislead the
public for decades into believing that there was no life on Mars or within our
Solar System? If the culture was advanced it is safe to assume that they
had knowledge of or access to space travel. Therefore they could have possibly
made a short interplanetary journey to Earth to re-colonize their species here.
As hard as it is
to believe, humanoid life on Earth could actually have originated on Mars, or
somewhere else in our Solar System. Our ancient history, or earliest
beginnings, could be traced to a mass migration from within our own Solar
System.
The mysterious
"Face" on Mars, glass tube tunnels, forests, vegetation, monoliths, pyramids,
scattered ancient artifacts, city complexes, massive towers, and crashed spacecraft are only a
few of the hundreds of anomalies we have seen on the surface of Mars that cry out
for further investigation. The same applies to unexplained structures on other
planets in our Solar System. To dismiss their existence is totally irresponsible
on behalf of NASA, the scientific community, and any government agency which has
final approval for funding space exploration. Perhaps they are natural phenomena. But we
won't be certain until they are thoroughly and objectively investigated.
Unfortunately we
don't have a roving correspondent traveling throughout our Solar System who is able to report all the
action to us. All we can rely on for now are the images (in many cases tampered)
released from NASA and ESA, along with statements and testimonies from
scientists, astronauts, and researchers associated with interplanetary missions and
projects to render an opinion.
With all of the
references in Hollywood films and science fiction to "little green
men" from Mars the chilling truth may be that we are the real Martians!
Mainstream science
would have us believe that Mars and other planets in our Solar System are completely void of life, past and present.
However, nothing could be further from the truth. Based on the conclusive evidence I
present these planets could very well hold the secrets to humanity's origins.
Following are just
some of the mysteries that are continually explored in my books.
|
|
In December
of 1972 Apollo 17 astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt
spent about 75 hours on the Moon. During their lunar expedition they
took the photo on the left. As incredible as it sounds it appears to be
the severed head of a robot. As Cernan put it, even though he was seeing
it with his own eyes, he still couldn't quite bring himself to believe
it. After overcoming his initial shock he realized that it couldn't be a
human skull. After all, it was lying in a debris field from an impact
crater, which had tossed up all manner of junk and material from just
below the valley floor. Something as fragile as a fossilized bone could
not possibly survive such an impact. Furthermore, exposure to extreme
solar and cosmic radiation would have long since reduced organic
material to a fine powder. This object was unmistakably of mechanical
origin. Color enhancements showed that the 'head' had a distinctive red
stripe around the area where the upper lip should be, a feature that
clearly appeared to be painted or anodized on the object. Composites of
other frames showed that the 'head' had two eye-sockets, a forehead,
brow ridges, a nose with nostrils, twin cheek bones and the upper half
of the jaw. The lower jaw seemed to be missing. Cernan dubbed the area
"one mysterious looking place". Many of the rocks had highly
unusual spectral qualities, reflecting light more like crystals or
highly polished metallic boxes. The bottom photo is an enlargement of
the severed head photographed in Shorty Crater by Cernan and Schmitt. To
this day there hasn't been a satisfactory explanation for this artifact
from the scientific community - only personal attacks on the credentials
or motives of those who offer it as evidence. Interestingly enough Cernan and Schmitt were the last astronauts to set
foot on the Moon. There were no further Moon landings after Apollo 17.
After this discovery isn't it understandable why?
|
|
|
Our Moon
has always been considered desolate and dead.
The image on the left is taken directly from the 1994 Navy Clementine
military official science data and shown above at standard official
resolution demonstrating two massive left and right towering objects in
the terrain. Although blur and smudge tampering applications have
completely covered up these objects so that no specific details of their
true structure can actually be seen, that doesn't mean that there isn't
plenty here to interpret and learn from. We can tell that these are most
likely massive, very tall vertical towering structures that dwarf by far
anything else in the terrain around it. The objects wider base footprint
tapering to a narrower form as it rises to a more slender top is typical
of a very tall skyscraper building here on Earth. However, these on the
Moon are much more massive and far taller than anything on Earth, no
doubt enabled by the Moon's much lower gravity. The middle image is
another taken from the Clementine satellite. Note that the obscured
angular image is still partially visible. Attempts to conceal the towers
have not always been successful. As can be seen by the bottom photograph
a massive tower is clearly visible on the NASA image enhanced using
modern image processing technology.
|
|
|
This image
from the Moon was taken by the
Lunar Orbiter. It shows dozens of pointed spires in varying heights
scattered across the surface. According to mainstream science our Moon
is supposedly a lifeless body of dust, so what are these odd structures?
Could these be trees, vegetation, natural geological formations or are
they something else?
|
|
The
image of this pyramid on the Moon was taken by the Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) in December 2008. How can nature create such
architectural perfection? What is the purpose of this structure? Is it
related to similar pyramid constructions found on Earth and Mars?
|
|
|
Detailed
analysis of photographs released by NASA has revealed evidence of
what appear to be ruins and artificial constructions of various types on
the Moon.
Photographs taken from Apollo spacecraft in lunar orbit show rectangular
and square shaped objects in Aristoteles Crater (photo on left). These
structures are most definitely not of natural origin.
|
|
|
The Aristarchus
Crater enigma is one of numerous so-called transient lunar phenomena
(TLP). It is the brightest spot on the Moon as seen from Earth, which
changes color, sometimes producing a red or bluish glow, and appears to
emit gas. In 1958 Aristarchus Crater's strange phenomena were observed
by Russian astronomer Nikolai Kozyrev. They were also reported by the
crew of Apollo 11. The nature of the crater phenomena has given credence
to a theory that there could be some sort of a power device, possibly a
fusion reactor, in the crater. On any photo published by NASA except for
a Clementine image this object is shown as a bright white smudge with no
definition. This structure appears to be supported by 5 or 6 arches. In
the foreground is a road that leads to a brightly lit tunnel entrance.
|
|
|
Another
lunar enigma is located at Copernicus Crater.
The site appears to resemble an ancient strip mine. As there is no wind
or free flowing water on the Moon erosion of the lunar terrain cannot be
involved in producing a landscape which resembles a vast mining
operation, with debris and rock piles and angled terraces. The
topography of the Copernicus Crater, such as ridges and ramps, resembles
that of strip mines seen on Earth.
|
|
|
This lunar
image is another view from Copernicus
Crater (NASA image PIA00094). Top photo shows a bright object resembling
a tower seen highlighted off in the distance. The bottom photo is an
enlargement and it shows that this object is hundreds, if not thousands,
of feet in height and that it is clearly independently glowing.
|
|
How
does NASA explain this? This white structure located in Copernicus
Crater seems to have an evident artificial architecture. A horizontal
half-circle shape (with a shadow on a part) terminating at the front
with a curved plan (on the right) toward the left side. An overhanging
'head' is located at the center of the structure. On the left of the
object there is a T-like building, with a spherical object above. Lunar
location for this anomaly is Eastern Oceanus Procellarum, Mare Insularum.
|
|
In
top Lunar Orbiter image
(LO-III-84M) on the left the ‘Shard’ is an obvious structure
which rises prominently above the Moon’s surface by more than a mile
(highlighted inside yellow frame). Its overall irregular spindly shape
(containing a regular geometric pattern) with constricted nodes and
swollen internodes, if natural, has got to be a wonder of the Universe.
No known natural process can explain such a structure. Computer
enhancement (bottom image) with about 190 feet resolution shows an
irregular outline with more reflective and less reflective surfaces. The
amount of sunlight reflecting from parts of the Shard indicates a
composition inconsistent with that of most natural substances. Only
crystal facets and glass can reflect that much light (polished metallic
surfaces are unnatural). Single crystals the size of city blocks are
currently unknown. Some researchers believe that the Shard may be a
highly eroded remnant of some sort of artificial structure made of
glass-like material. Other larger structures and their reflectivity in
the area support this theory.
|
|
|
There are
many more unexplained lunar anomalies. For
example, in the upper part of Rima Hadley (photo on left), not far from
the place where Apollo 15 landed, a construction surrounded by a tall
D-shaped wall was discovered. As is evident in this photo the structure
has been deliberately obscured by airbrushing it - yet another case of
blatant image tampering. What is hidden behind this smudging?
|
|
|
This image
from the Lunar Orbiter shows a long streak or
ribbon rising from the lunar surface. Could this be smoke rising from a
campfire on the Moon? A smoke trail from a comet or asteroid would not
end/start so abruptly in space. There would be a fading out effect
present. This image shows a definite start/stop point where this streak
ends or begins in space. Whatever this mysterious object is, it extends
several miles into space and doesn't have an Earthly equivalent.
|
|
|
Apollo 8
was the first
manned spaceflight to leave Earth orbit; the first to be captured by
and escape from the gravitational field of another celestial body; and
the first voyage to return to planet Earth from another celestial body -
Earth's Moon. This December 1968 transcript (shown on left) references a
conversation between Apollo 8 astronauts Commander Frank Borman (CDR),
Command Module Pilot James Lovell (CMP), and Lunar Module Pilot William
Anders (LMP). They describe bonfires spotted on the lunar surface during
Day 4 of their mission. It is doubtful that astronauts, in the midst of
a critical mission, would joke about something like this. The fact that
the transcript was classified for more than 40 years hints that NASA
certainly took this conversation very seriously.
|
|
|
Apollo 14
was the eighth manned mission in the
Apollo program, and the third to land on the Moon. This Apollo 14
transcript (shown on left) describes mining activities observed on the
Moon. Command Module Pilot Stuart Roosa (CMP) mentions this during Day 4
of their February 1971 mission. The astronauts believe they see someone
mining on the Moon!
|
|
|
This bizarre
lunar object (NASA image AS8-12-2209) was taken by Apollo 8. The
bottom photo is a higher resolution version. What could it be - a giant
spider, wiring harness, rope or lunar vegetation?
|
|
The
two Apollo 8 lunar images on the left reveal a partially obscured
structure located within the circular white ring. The lower image is an
enlargement (NASA image AS08-13-2350). As you can see, especially in the magnified bottom image,
there appear to be multiple height structures rising from the center
area of the white ring and this structure evidence is blocking our view
of the back white area of the ring. Note that the white ring appears to
be of equal depth and reflective quality all the way around. This is
typical of other such rings in this and other Apollo 8 images. This
configuration would not be the case if this was what we would normally
assume it to be which would be an impact crater depression. Normally an
impact crater would contain a depression in the center of the impact
area and to some degree have a raised rim on the periphery of the
depression. Nor does this ring exhibit the shadow characteristics of an
impact crater. In other words, we are not looking at an impact crater
depression here. There are many of these rings around on the Moon in the
Apollo 8 imaging, including more in this particular image, and all of
them display a very dark heavily obscured mass like the one shown here,
rising in height from the ring's center area and that height blocks the
view of the rear portion of the ring. The tall, dark object rising from
the center cannot be a shadow. Shadows always have some transparency
depth to them and as such will lighten a bit in a graphics program - but
not in this situation. This is more indicative of an image tampering
application. But what was someone trying to hide?
|
|
|
Apollo 10
astronauts took this photo (AS10-32-4822) of
a one-mile long object called 'Castle', which casts a distinct shadow on
the lunar surface. The object seems to consist of several cylindrical
units and a large connecting unit.
|
|
|
This Apollo
10 image AS10-32-4822 shows a square crater on the lunar surface. Since
when does Mother Nature carve out square craters? This crater area
contains peculiar scored straight lines along the surface.
|
|
|
Luna
9 was an unmanned space probe of the Soviet Union's Luna program. On
February 3, 1966 Luna 9 became the first spacecraft to achieve a soft
landing on any planetary body other than Earth and to transmit
photographic data back to Earth from the Moon. Photo on the left is from
the Luna 9 probe. It shows what appears to be a large craft or vehicle
whose shape resembles that of an ocean going ship on Earth, coming to a
point at one end and having an elevated section on top. A cable or tube
appears to extend from the rear of the object toward the surface.
Contact with Luna 9 was lost on February 6, 1966 just three days after
landing.
|
|
|
Luna
13, also known as Lunik 13, was another Soviet probe in the Luna
program. It accomplished a soft lunar landing on December 24, 1966 in
the region of Oceanus Procellarum. This intriguing photo was taken
before its onboard batteries went dead and transmission stopped on
December 28, 1966. The image displays some type of circular disk with a
thin axle running through the center and the object is partially buried
in the soil. The unknown object was not part of the space probe. Bottom
photo is an enlargement.
|
|
|
This Apollo
16 image is from King Crater on the Moon. Note
the unusual structure highlighted inside the red frame. It appears to
have a round top or roof.
|
|
|
This Lunar
Orbiter image is from Zeeman Crater on the
far side of the Moon. The strange structure shown here has some kind of
rectangular opening and is obviously not a natural formation. It appears
more like a subterranean entrance. The rectangular opening is 5 miles
wide, and one mile high.
|
|
|
A multi-level
lunar structure with openings is highlighted in the top photo on
left. It is enlarged in the bottom two photos and is clearly not part of
the natural landscape surrounding it, sitting all alone in the middle of
a crater-filled surface.
|
|
|
This lunar
anomaly (NASA image LO-5-125-H2A)
reveals a tower and several other geometric structures. Is this a
natural geological formation or something artificial?
|
|
|
This image
is from the Lunar Orbiter. It shows an unusual
structure that resembles a fortress sitting high atop a hill. The
many sharp 90-degree shapes, walls, and steps make it highly unlikely
that it is a natural geological formation.
|
|
|
This lunar
anomaly shows some type of artificial structures. Could nature form
such straight vertical walls with openings (doors or windows)? Some of
these buildings also appear to have sloped walls and roofs. Anyone with
a shred of common sense would admit that these structures cannot
possibly be natural formations.
|
|
The series
of five images on left are assorted lunar anomalies observed on the
far side of the Moon. The strange object in the top image is some kind
of structure with extensions - possibly a crashed spacecraft, or some
type of mining device or equipment. Some of the protrusions appear to be
attached to or penetrating the nearby lunar surface.
In the
image on the left, the area at the bottom of the crater exhibits an
organized pattern of perpendicular geometric shapes - an indication of
artificial design. Nature is not capable of creating such geometrically
precise features. There are clearly visible buildings and roadways. This
image is very similar to any aerial photo taken on Earth of an urbanized
area.
The
photo on the left shows clear evidence of image tampering. The obvious
smudging effect in this image is intended to hide a large object -
possibly a building or artificial structure. The circular white rings
extending from beneath the tall obscured object are likely part of the
structure itself. There are several white rings in this image and the smudging
is not limited to one single area but continues throughout the
photo.
I have
nicknamed the structure shown in the bottom two images as the
"Roman Coliseum" because of its close resemblance to the
famous historical landmark built in Rome, Italy. The bottom image is an
enlargement and shows another series of buildings encircling the main
structure. What could these separate compartments be - rooms for
storage, living quarters, or something else?
As you
can see from these images there is something definitely not right on the
dark side of the Moon.
|
|
|
This lunar
anomaly is tucked away neatly inside of
a crater. The only official NASA description for this Apollo 11 image
AS11-41-6156 is "view of area west of Crater 308 from lunar
orbit". The pink circled section is enlarged in the bottom photo
and reveals a square structure (perhaps a walled compound) with at least
two buildings or objects inside.
|
|
|
This Apollo
11 lunar image shows a series of buildings situated on either side
of a roadway. Note the shadows cast by these buildings indicating (a)
that they are definitely vertical structures and, (b) they are all very
similar in design.
|
|
|
Top photo
on left is official NASA image from
the Moon. Bottom photo is the same photo except that the anomalous
objects have been highlighted in color for clarity. Surely these objects
cannot be natural rock formations.
|
|
|
Top photo
is another official NASA image from the
lunar surface. Bottom photo is the same photo except that the anomalous
object has been highlighted in color for clarity. The unusual object
looks almost spherical in shape and highly polished. It certainly is not
part of the surrounding terrain and looks very much artificial in design.
|
|
|
The
skeptics are hard pressed to call this object
a "trick of light" or "just a typical rock". In this
Apollo 16 image you can see a round cylindrical object partially buried
with a serrated but symmetrical edge. It resembles gear teeth on a
shaft. In order for it to be buried so deeply in the soil it must be
quite old. A piece of an Earth probe falling to the lunar surface would
only have happened in the last 50 years and therefore clearly visible
lying on top of the surface.
|
|
|
This Apollo
17 image AS17-137-20993HR shows a round object resembling a ring.
Once again it is partially buried (probably one-third of the object
depth) indicating that it has been there for a long time. It is very
unlikely that nature can create perfectly round objects having a hole in
the center.
|
|
|
This image
is a screen capture from an Apollo 17 video
taken December 12, 1972 from Tsiolkovskiy Crater on the Moon's far side.
It is a 4-minute clip with the astronaut giving a narration but no
mention of the strange object located inside the crater is made. You can
hear bits of a second conversation in the background, most likely
talking on the other secured channel. Halfway through the video the
background speaker makes some exclamation of surprise.
|
|
|
This image
shows Reiner Crater on the Moon located just
under the four lines of text. The white blurred object to the left of
the crater is called Reiner Gamma. On the long tail section extending up
from Reiner Gamma is a black square that has been shown for many years
as a lunar anomaly on the 1994 Clementine space probe images.
|
|
In
the top Clementine image on left you can see many rigidly uniform,
very straight vertical and parallel bands on the Moon’s surface.
Whatever these bands are they are all oriented south to north on the Moon as well as
uniformly, evenly and precisely separated the exact same distance from
one band across horizontally to the next band. The entire Clementine Moon imaging is visually a sea
of many different types and levels of image tampering
applications and obfuscation techniques covering and hiding evidence and
creating false illusions as to terrain detail in the process and
essentially covering and obscuring most of the Moon’s entire surface
as well as these bands. There is one piece of strong evidence in
this scene highlighted with the red arrow and label. It is obviously a
geometric rectangular structure demonstrating sharp uniform right angles
and highly suggestive of an elevated building top and/or a walled
compound area containing evidence that has been visually covered up by
the image tampering on its top area. Remember this is a very
distant scene and such a structure would therefore have to be very much
larger than the visual impression of a normal size building given in
this imaging where all sense of scale size reference is lost in a sea of
image tampering. Take special note of the light color smaller area
projecting off the mid area of the left end of the structure and located
right up against it. There also appears to be something resembling an arrow
on it pointing to the right toward the structure. Remember that such an
arrow in such a location could only be meant to be seen from above
implying artificial flight ability. In the bottom image, with its closer
view, you can see that the rectangular structure apparently had some
objects on its top surface but these have been covered and smoothed over
by some image tampering coordinated color wise to the structure’s
lighter color.
|
|
|
This Clementine
space probe image is from the lunar impact crater Tycho. The
mysterious object in this photo looks to be symmetrical with two
"nodes" and curved arms extending out from the central body.
There appears to be some underlying support just to the left of the
right-hand curved "arm", but the central spherical
"node" looks to be located above the ground, judging by the
shadow beneath it. What process could account for this object forming
naturally?
|
|
|
Other than
the fact that this looks like a baseball just
knocked out a bird, the markings and shape of the objects in the bottom
image are intriguing. This photo is from Apollo 16. The bottom image is
an enlargement of the unknown round object shown in the top photo
highlighted by the lower black arrow.
|
|
|
This Apollo
16 image shows a rock that resembles a slab of concrete. Could such
a flat piece of rock be formed naturally and positioned upright all
alone? There are no other rocks similar to it located anywhere nearby.
|
|
On
December 21, 1968 Apollo 8 was launched with a three man crew
consisting of Mission Commander Frank Borman, Command Module Pilot James
Lovell, and Lunar Module Pilot William Anders. The Command Module
orbited the Moon ten times and returned home to Earth without the crew
attempting to land on the Moon. It is unknown whether the five images on the left were taken while on the way
to the Moon, while orbiting the Moon, or while returning home from the
Moon to Earth. Keep
in mind that the cameras here are using film (Hasselblad 70mm) and not
digital media. Later the Apollo 8 film images were scanned and converted
to digital media for display on the Internet in a process known to be
careless producing many artifacts in the digital images. The images
shown here are obtained from the scanned digital images and not from the
film originals. The top two images on the left are #AS08-13-2382. In the
top image the evidence details are very dark and dim but an unusual
object is evident in the bottom right hand corner (indicated next to
yellow arrow marker). The second image from the top with some graphics
enhancement reveals quite a bit of the object’s detail and looks very
strange. There is little question whether it represents organic life or
not, but the real question is whether it represents alien life in outer
space or some scanned-in Earth microbial life due to carelessness in
keeping the scanning plate sufficiently clean and free of debris here on
Earth. If this were the only visual evidence being considered you might
be inclined to guess that it is an Earth-based vegetation microbial seed
of some kind that is trying to sprout and finding no soil media to
sprout into is producing many different sprouts (tendrils) and therefore
nothing particularly strange at all. However, take a look at similar
evidence in the bottom three images. The bottom three images
#AS08-13-2380 are of a similar nature but also more extensive than the
evidence in the top two images. Image AS08-13-2380 is a much higher
resolution (HR) image while the previously shown AS08-13-2382 image is
not available in HR and is only of regular dimensions. However, note how
3-dimensional this AS08-13-2380 object looks and note that it does not
give the appearance of having been squashed down and flattened by the
weight of a scanner plate which would be the case if this were soft
organic vegetative material. How then is this supposed to be Earth-based
organic vegetation debris pulled up and out of growth media and torn
open in the process? Also note the many tiny bright specks, many of
which are either on top of the object’s parts or behind it and shining
through this object’s parts. Are some of these specks actually stars
in the background or the tiniest debris on the scanning plate? One clue
is that these tiny bright specks are also present in that part of the
Earth in deep dark shadow in this imaging. That would tend to rule them
out as stars in the background and support any contention that they are
tiny debris reflecting the scanner’s light source. An alternative
consideration is that the brighter specks are stars seen closer and
brighter in the background and in a number of places being seen through
the object’s material could suggest that the object is
semi-transparent. In such a scenario, the object may actually consist of
a gel-like substance and thereby be organic life similar to what we see
in the deepest and darkest parts of our Earth oceans. The natural
reaction, especially for the mainstream that doesn’t want to know any
differently, is that all of this bizarre evidence is just debris
carelessly left on the scanner plate. Some even insist that it might be
ice or mold forming on the Command Module window which the astronauts are
filming through. However, if so and especially with the image numbers
being so close together at 2380 and 2382 and being taken so close
together, it would still be there in subsequent camera shots of the same
scene out the same window at the same distance from Earth and it just
isn’t there. We need to keep an open mind. I strongly suspect that it
is possible for organic life to exist in space. Simply reference evidence in
our own Solar System from Saturn’s moon Enceladus and video from the
Tether Incident during STS-75 in February 1996 as only two of several
examples. We also know from the existence of extremophiles
here on Earth that an organism can thrive in physically or geochemically
extreme conditions that are detrimental to most life on Earth. In order
to prove definitively what this mysterious object is we would need
access to the original 70mm Hasselblad film for these two images to see
if these objects are there in that film. If the objects are present in
the original film, then we may indeed have some Earth shaking evidence
of some very strange and disturbing space life. You must make up your
own mind as to where you think the truth lies in this material.
|
|
|
Mercury
is only 48 million miles from Earth, compared to Mars which is 35
million miles away - both virtual planetary neighbors. Several large
mysterious objects were photographed by Messenger Orbiter during its
Mercury flyby between January 2008-09. The top photo looks like a
spacecraft sitting inside of a crater. The bottom photo shows more
detail including the object's aerodynamic shape, perhaps even the
windshield and tailwing. Whatever this object is, it isn't natural.
Something this large just doesn't take up residence in the middle of an
impact crater. It obviously located itself sometime after the crater's
formation.
|
|
The two
images on the left are from Mercury and were taken by the Messenger
Orbiter. The top photo (image 65195) from March 29, 2011 looks to be a
tall tower or geyser emerging from a circular walled building or crater.
The outside walls of the structure appear a distinct bluish color
compared to the other landscape features in the image, and the tower
looks to cast a bluish shadow over some of the immediate surrounding terrain. This shadow
could also be spillage from the spray. The bottom photo appears to be a
round structure, perhaps the remains of a domed building at some point
in time. Vertical walls can clearly be seen along with some type of base
with a monolith standing upright on it. Note the shadows that are cast
by the vertical walls.
|
|
|
Another
Mercury anomaly is a complex structure with a giant
spiral tower and bunker (top photo). The spiral tower is a complete
mystery and must be miles high. It is not smoke rising from a volcano or
anything on the surface because the structure remains rigid and intact
and never changes its appearance or form over several minutes of photography. A
billowing of smoke would change and continually move. The lower two
photos show the symmetrical walls on the entrance. They appear as
straight edges much like walls and a roof. These cannot be natural
formations.
|
|
|
On October
6, 2008 Messenger Orbiter provided these strange photos in its 2.4
mile flyby of Mercury. Middle photo shows two large objects inside of a
61-mile diameter crater - one almost white in color and the other
(bottom right corner of image) is a grayish color. The bottom photo
shows the grayish object enlarged. It looks very much like a spacecraft
of some kind.
|
|
|
This photo
is from the Mariner 10 space probe in 1974
during its Mercury flyby. It shows a massive object inside of a crater
and the shadows that are cast by the object. What is especially
noteworthy is the symmetry and shape of the shadows. They appear very
sharp and pointed, almost pyramidal in form. This is very rare in nature. This
object could very well be some type of building.
|
|
|
This photo
is from NASA's Magellan space probe
taken of the planet Venus. It shows what appears to be a multi-story
structure. The central building has at least five levels - six if you
count the small area in front. There are buildings with right angles
everywhere - something that just doesn't occur in nature. There could be
a stairway leading up the various levels of the main building and a
protective wall running along the right side of the area, along a ridge.
The upper left area is completely artificial consisting of pyramids,
domes and buildings. The extreme foreground also holds a large
symmetrical building which is partially obscured. Those aren't really
shadows on the ground. Due to thick cloud cover, sunlight doesn't reach
the ground on Venus so it's unknown what the source of this dark
contrast is.
|
|
|
This photo
is NASA/JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) image
PIA00102 from Eistla Regio on Venus. What is the possible
explanation for the two totally flat rectangular surfaces on an
otherwise hilly and mountainous terrain? What is hidden behind the
intentional airbrushing/smudging in this picture? Is this another
example of official NASA image tampering?
|
|
Norman
Bergrun was an engineer and photographic expert who worked for NASA almost 30 years. He and a group of others were responsible
for forming what they called the Voyager program. In the late 1970s
astronomers and NASA had discovered some anomalous things happening
within the rings of Saturn. So they put together the Voyager program and
sent Voyager One to the rings of Saturn in 1980. Pictures from Voyager
One were sent back to NASA and scientists were astounded by what they
saw. In 1986 Bergrun decided to blow the whistle and publish these
photographs. He wrote a book titled Ring-makers of Saturn. He
couldn't get his book published in the United States. American
publishers wouldn't touch him, or even talk to him. He eventually had to
go to Aberdeen, Scotland to get his book published. The top photo on
left shows a close-up of a self-luminous orange dot, obviously
artificial in construction, and under intelligent control because it
moves around inside the rings of Saturn independently. It isn't known
what this object is, but it is larger than our Moon. The bottom photo on
left is from inside of the 'A' Ring of Saturn and the statistics on this
anomaly will blow your mind. The object shown in this image is
artificially constructed, according to Bergrun. NASA called it an
electromagnetic vehicle. It is 2,000 miles long and over 450 miles in
diameter! And here we see another self-luminous artificial object (large
dot near bottom of same photo), about the size of our Moon that
apparently moves about independently, wherever it chooses, under
intelligent control. Consider for a moment the civilization and the
technology that is capable of not only building something of this
magnitude, but also of putting it into space and maneuvering it. What is
the the purpose of these enormous objects?
|
|
|
Enceladus
is one of the moons of Saturn. It is covered mostly in fresh, clean ice
and reflects almost all of the sunlight that strikes it. In fact it is
the most reflective object in our entire Solar System. This
massive structure was photographed by the Cassini
space probe during its flyby of Enceladus on
October 31, 2008. It resembles a large building or perhaps a
spaceship.
|
|
NASA’s
Cassini spacecraft flew by two Saturn
moons in late April and early May 2012 to take what scientists say are the
last close-up views of the geyser-covered Enceladus
and cratered Dione for several years. Top image of Enceladus, one of
Saturn’s 62 known moons, was taken on April 24, 2007. A flat
disc-shaped object appears in the bottom left corner. The same object is
also present in the bottom, more distant, image of Enceladus taken on
May 2, 2012. What is amazing is that the same object appears in both
images - 5 years apart. It is
interesting to note that, in a dark background with no stars or other
celestial objects visible, the long disc-shaped object stands out so prominently –
both in a close-up view and in a more distant view, in two different
positions in the frame. It also appears to generate or emit its own
independent source of light. Since these are raw images NASA didn’t have
a chance to apply their infamous image tampering process, but no doubt
they will insist that the mysterious object must be a piece of space debris. If it
is, it must be an incredibly massive chunk of debris, given its relationship and
proximity to Enceladus in these two images. And its behavior is highly
unusual as well. It is hard to believe that space debris could orient
itself in such a peculiar way in two separate images five years apart. Are we to believe that, in the vastness of outer
space, Cassini just happened to stumble onto the same piece of space
debris twice in 5 years? This would be an unbelievable coincidence. Bottom image was taken by Cassini
from a distance of approximately 239,799 miles.
|
|
|
Iapetus
is the third largest moon of Saturn and is best known for a prominent
equatorial ridge (hump) that stretches halfway around the moon. Top
photo on left is original NASA/ESA image P1A06170 from Cassini space
probe taken of Iapetus North Pole area. The second image down is the same photo except that the anomalous
structures have been highlighted in color for clarity. Note the large
number of buildings and geometric structures shown in blue. Most
unusual, however, is the enormous statue or monument shown inside of
yellow border. Third image down is an enlargement of the statue in
original grayscale. Bottom image is the same photo except that the
monument has been highlighted in color for clarity. Whatever this
structure is, it is incredibly large and is undoubtedly artificial in
design.
|
|
|
Titan, the
largest moon of Saturn, is also the only moon in our Solar System to
have a fully developed, planet-like atmosphere. These
images are from Saturn taken
during a Cassini flyby in 2005. They reveal many more unusual large
objects. These photos were taken from an altitude of 11 miles, therefore
these objects must be huge. Top photo appears to be a spaceship or some
kind of large vehicle. The middle photo shows another vehicle or
structure just below it. The bottom photo reveals yet another unknown
object. Titan is Saturn's largest moon. It is larger than the planet
Mercury. And NASA still maintains that Saturn's 62 moons are
uninhabitable.
|
|
|
|
|
